This space is dedicated to open discussions on critical topics that we believe are essential to the future of EEG research and its applications. From affordable, portable EEG devices to the rise of machine learning tools and brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), EEG technology is becoming more accessible. But with this progress come challenges, including validity issues for research, societal issues like the democratisation of research practices, changes in funding policies, or the sustainability of research as a whole in an uncertain future.
The EEGManifesto aims to provide a deontological framework for EEG research, advocating for ethical practices grounded in scientific integrity, democratic practices and social and technological responsibility. It is a call to action for scientists, organizations, and stakeholders to reflect on their practices and adopt commitments based on their own needs and resources. The manifesto isn’t just about signing a document; it’s about driving ethical, sustainable progress in EEG science.
How to Contribute:
- In order to contribute to the discussion, you need to register. Please request an invite at contact@cuttingeeg.org.
- Start or join discussions: Share your thoughts on how EEG research can evolve to meet future challenges.
- Propose ideas: Suggest initiatives, policies, or research directions that align with the manifesto’s ethical framework.
- Share resources: Post relevant papers, tools, or case studies that help foster ethical practices in EEG research.
- Collaborate: Connect with others to turn the manifesto’s principles into action through projects, research, or advocacy.
The success of this manifesto depends on the actions it inspires, so let’s work together to create a more ethical and sustainable future for EEG research.
Starting topics:
We have identified three domains challenging the future of EEG practice.
The manifesto is structured around these themes, each explored in depth through dedicated discussion topics:
- Validity and scientific integrity in the face of evolving practices [add link to dedicated channel]
This section calls for further supporting a culture of rigorous, open, agreed upon science. - Democratisation: the importance of diversity and inclusion to support the development of EEG science [add link to dedicated channel]
This section calls for opening research largely at all stages, from scientists’ contributions, to experimental participants of diverse horizons, and reaching out as widely as possible to all communities that could benefit from it. - Responsibility: considering societal impacts, issues of equity, and sustainability [add link to dedicated channel]
This section calls for ethically well grounded, technologically, and environmentally responsible scientific practice.
In this topic (reply below! 
), you can add general remarks, comments and questions.